Multiple Testing Techniques for Antivirus Apps and Software. anti virus protectionMany of us have security software like an anti virus protection, firewall, Host Intrusion Prevention System or antimalware installed to help secure our computer or scan website for malware.

Malicious software can be exceptionally tricky, getting onto your computer when you least expect it and stay hidden until the point that the anti virus protection software finally detects it.

By at that point, the damage has already been done as the virus has been active and you wouldn’t recognize what data has been stolen from your computer.

However, the main query is, how would you know whether the antivirus software or antimalware installed is really securing your computer?

The antivirus program would most likely express that your computer is secured or the protection is enabled yet how might you make sure that it is really working and affirm if the antivirus or its virus protection software definition hasn’t been tampered with?

Looking for a real virus from the Internet and downloading it to your computer just to test if your antivirus can find it may not be the best choice since you’re taking a chance with your computer being affected by it in case you’re not careful.

Here we have 4 multiple techniques in the field of testing anti virus protection software and similar products to check whether the continuous protection is really enabled and attempting to ensure your computer against viruses.


  • Dynamic
  • Static
  • Retrospective
  • Reaction rate tests

Let’s thoroughly study every stated type:

Dynamic Testing:

Its sensibility is to perform reproducing of real customer’s condition, in which we effectively test an essential product, which is responsible for the security of client condition, with the assistance of the most accessible number of conceivable virtual tools. Such antivirus test turns out to be increasingly well known because of the speedy development of new tools and strategies, which can’t be completely performed inside traditional testing condition.

Such test can be viewed as the most like a real circumstance and, as it turned out to be clear, a possibility to oppose malicious software and components in most customer products is much lower than various discovered viruses at the time of testing infected files and different documents at your requests.

Static Testing:

It’s the most simple and the clearest method for antivirus software testing to test the functionality of anti virus programs or same products. Its sense lies in required verification at a technical request, which is reproduced relying on malware check.

Keeping in mind the end goal to get specific outcomes from a static test, you should utilize a huge collection of malware, which structure has in excess of a thousand records and comparable reports.

In the net, you can discover special collections of test associations (AV-Test and AV-Comparatives) which have in excess of a thousand possible software and documents, which permit performing effective testing. Sometimes its structure can comprise up to approx 1000 000 documents.

Retrospective Testing:

Rather than traditional strategies and methods for testing, retrospective testing is performed to test diverse versions of computer anti virus protection at the moment but in past.

Normally, such a minute is exceptionally a long way from a date of testing, for the most possible number of computer viruses, with which you have to work, will have been produced. It implies that the consequences of retrospective testing permit checking a real security of tested antivirus software product.

Testing a Reaction Rate:

Despite the fact that such a technique isn’t extremely utilized and well known, such kind of testing must be thoroughly described and decoded.

As opposed to the static sort of testing, testing a reaction rate utilizes a very little arrangement of fundamental examples.

To precisely distinguish a reaction rate of the tested antiviruses, firstly turn attention toward the speed of finding the last alteration and build of malware content. Incidentally, while performing such testing, the preferred standpoint is given to those ant viruses, which databases are frequently restored and are refreshed with new data and protection records.

To conclude, we may make a clear end that today there are not 100% productive software segment which will totally quick and simply “kill and destroy” malware components and information.

In any case, a total understanding of possible risks and the correct selection of strategies for antivirus check can help to massively decrease a level of possible viruses and appropriately build a procedure of testing and analysis of specific malware scanner. It implies that your QA team should have dependably approach testing antivirus components and with a reasonable understanding of performed activities.

Share on: