Actuality versus Myths of Software Performance testing at various stagesThere are True Facts versus Myths in software performance testing. We think if application is moderate, connect with the performance testing team quickly to determine the bottlenecks. It is totally 100% – wrong sense.

In the present web condition performance matters– a lot. And a standout amongst other approaches to guarantee that your application will execute as anticipate, under production loads, is to do automated performance testing.

This involves testing the application with production level load in the real condition in which it works.

Software Performance testing is a sort of testing that reproduces the practical end client load and access design in a controlled domain with a specific end goal to discover the speed, responsiveness, and strength of the framework.

Load and performance testing generally requires revealing of framework performance metrics like exchange reaction time, simultaneous client loads upheld, server throughput, etc helps in breaking down the potential bottlenecks that influences the framework execution and adaptability.


Below are mentioned some of the actuality vs. myths of Software performance testing:

Test Execution stage:-

Myth: Developers can just tune the application performance testing.

Truth: Performance Architects give proposals and tuning recommendations yet the usage of the suggestions would be with improvement/Project team.

Myth: Performance issues can be settled by essentially connecting to additional equipment

Actuality: Performance issues can be in – Improper Server Configuration, Application Code, Infrastructure Application Code, and so on.

Myth: To decide general application execution, two effective benchmark tests are sufficient/adequate

Actuality: Number of tests and test sorts are essentially decided in view of Performance targets. Performance testing companies will dependably suggest the relevant test sorts.


Test Development Stage:-

Myth: Performance testing concepts is all about learning and utilizing an open source performance testing tools or load and performance testing tools.

Actuality: Design practical situations and Derive Workload Mix. Derive a reasonable end-to-end performance testing approach. Characterize clear goals for each test sort. Break down Performance from both Software and Hardware viewpoint. Distinguish Performance bottlenecks and give proposals.

Myth: Performance testing process is measuring the reaction time meets the characterized SLA.

Actuality: System performance test goals can incorporate the evaluation of different NFRs such as Availability, Scalability and so forth. Test app Performance is one of the basic NFRs.

Myth: Performance testing strategy and Test cases utilized by functional team can be influence for Performance Testing.

Actuality: Performance Testing covers just basic exchanges – Most as often as possible utilized, Complex Business capacities and System serious operations.


Test Planning Stage:-

Myth: Software performance testing can be finished in 2 to 4 month.

Actuality: Performance testing term can’t be settled to “x” weeks as it relies on the Performance Test objective, Complexity of the application. Applications including complex engineering can take a long time to be execution tested.

Myth: Performance Testing should be possible ONLY towards the finish of the testing life cycle.

Actuality:  Base covering effort upfront took after by incremental tests to check if execution is enhancing or falling apart. Early Performance testing should be possible in parallel with Development if relevant for complex engagements. Execution bugs are very costly to be settled toward the finish of SDLC. It could prompt change in specialized plan.

Myth: Performance testing can be locked in once System Integration Testing is in advance.

Actuality: Performance Test Script Development can begin while System Integration Testing is in advance anyway it is suggested that test executions start simply after System Integration Testing Completion.


Test Requirement stage:

Myth: Project group can choose if Software Performance testing is required or not as they are the app owners.

Actuality: Involve Performance specialists and engineers amid Non-functional necessary Assessment to close the danger and requirement for Performance testing.

Myth: When there are no Performance Testing Non-practical necessities, advancement group or Project Managers can characterize them.

Actuality: Business group characterizes the Non-practical necessities in simultaneousness with Solution Architects to outline the framework and application to meet the Non-practical necessities. In case of application is underway, Performance testing team would help infer the NFRs by breaking down the creation logs or utilizing performance testing tools.

Myth: Non-functional necessities allude to just an application reaction time.

Actuality: Non-practical necessities allude to Key Performance indicators such as Availability, Scalability, Stability, Security, Reliability, Capacity, Usability and Accessibility. It’s just not an application reaction time.


These are some of the truth and Myths of Performance testing that are hard to distinguish. We at TestOrigen have highly well educated testers that are well known about how to do performance testing and provides best performance testing services at Delhi/NCR region using performance testing jmeter tool.



Share on: